Chevrolet Captiva 2019 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is available with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 135 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 195 - 211 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 1.8 - 8.7 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1081 litres | 1602 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`055 | ~ 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |