Chevrolet Captiva 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Captiva is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda CX-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 195 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 - 7.0 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 38 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1081 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`055 | ~ 1`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |