Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Touran can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 258 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 11 seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 9.5 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touran. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Captiva has 218 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 412 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`411 | ~ 2`177 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |