Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Renault Koleos 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 258 HP | 130 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 11 seconds | 9.3 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 9.5 | 4.6 - 8.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Koleos. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1690 litres | |
|
Renault Koleos has more luggage space. Chevrolet Captiva has 61 litres less trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`411 | ~ 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Koleos has
| |