Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 258 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 11 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 9.5 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 22 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1478 litres | |
| Chevrolet Captiva has 5 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.6 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`411 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |