Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Kia Sorento 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 258 HP | 150 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 225 - 436 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 11 seconds | 9.7 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 9.5 | 6.4 - 8.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Sorento. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Captiva is 1 cm shorter than the Kia Sorento, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sorento has more luggage space. Chevrolet Captiva has 38 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia Sorento, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`411 | ~ 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Sorento has
| |