Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Audi Q3 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 258 HP | 125 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 220 - 465 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 11 seconds | 4.4 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 9.5 | 4.2 - 8.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q3. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 29 cm longer than the Audi Q3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1365 litres | |
| Chevrolet Captiva has 17 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 212 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi Q3, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`411 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q3 has
| |