Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Toyota Celica 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 60 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.7 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Celica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 58 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |