Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 76 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.4 | |
|
The Chevrolet Camaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Camaro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 35 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 503 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |