Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 12.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Camaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Camaro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 26 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |