Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs BMW 3 series 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 53 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 115 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.0 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 49 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 435 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 488 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |