Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Mercedes SLK 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 4 HP less power than Mercedes SLK, but torque is 25 NM more than Mercedes SLK. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 90 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |