Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Mercedes SLK 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 30 HP more power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Mercedes SLK. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.6 | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.28 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 90 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |