Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 31 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 34 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |