Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Mercedes SL 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 405 HP | 335 HP | |
| Torque: | 556 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 70 HP more power than Mercedes SL, whereas torque is 76 NM more than Mercedes SL. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 22 cm longer than the Mercedes SL, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 241 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 381 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 79 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes SL, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |