Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs BMW 2 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 405 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 556 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 215 HP more power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 156 NM more than BMW 2 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.1 | |
| BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 40 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 335 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 40 litres more trunk space than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |