Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Mercedes SL 2012

 
Chevrolet Camaro
2011 - 2012
Mercedes SL
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Petrol3.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 315 HP306 HP
Torque: 370 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds5.9 seconds
Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 9 HP more power than Mercedes SL, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.06.8
The Mercedes SL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Camaro consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 630 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 71 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway1200 km on highway
Mercedes SL gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.62 m
Width: 1.92 m1.88 m
Height: 1.38 m1.32 m
Chevrolet Camaro is larger.
Chevrolet Camaro is 22 cm longer than the Mercedes SL, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 289 litres241 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
290 litres381 litres
Chevrolet Camaro has 48 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SL. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes SL (by 91 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes SL, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`065
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 22 20023 000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Camaro has
  • roomier boot
Mercedes SL has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv