Chevrolet Camaro 2008 vs Chrysler 300C 2006
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 6.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 400 HP | 425 HP | |
Torque: | 410 NM | 570 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 seconds | |
Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 25 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 71 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.48 m | |
Chevrolet Camaro is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 504 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 184 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 2`355 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |