Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 59 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.0 | |
| Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 300C engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Equinox | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Camaro might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 184 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |