Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Chevrolet Camaro) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volkswagen Scirocco) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 312 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 377 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 172 HP more power than Volkswagen Scirocco, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 5.1 | |
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Scirocco gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Scirocco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Equinox | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 58 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 292 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1006 litres | |
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 28 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |