Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Ford Mustang 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 HP | 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 228 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 314 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 13.9 | |
|
The Chevrolet Camaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Camaro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 430 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 570 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Camaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 6 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 48 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |