Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Dodge Charger 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 16 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.0 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Charger engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Equinox | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 24 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 467 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 147 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |