Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 98 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 26 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 527 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 207 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |