Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Audi S5 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 312 HP | 354 HP | |
Torque: | 377 NM | 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 42 HP less power than Audi S5, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Audi S5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.8 | |
Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi S5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Camaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 20 cm longer than the Audi S5, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 455 litres | |
Audi S5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 135 litres less trunk space than the Audi S5. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`175 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi S5 has
| |