Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 405 HP | 453 HP | |
| Torque: | 556 NM | 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2016 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro 2013 engine produces 48 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro 2016, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro 2016. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.4 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Camaro 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Camaro 2013 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro 2013 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Camaro 2013 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro 2016. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.34 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro 2013 is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro 2016, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro 2013 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |