Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Mercedes CLS 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Camaro) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mercedes CLS) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 58 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, but torque is 342 NM less than Mercedes CLS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 10 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 156 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |