Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Mercedes CLA 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 323 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 167 HP more power than Mercedes CLA, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Mercedes CLA. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLA) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 21 cm longer than the Mercedes CLA, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 470 litres | |
Mercedes CLA has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 106 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLA. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 14 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes CLA has
| |