Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Mercedes CLA 2013

 
Chevrolet Camaro
2013 - 2016
Mercedes CLA
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 323 HP156 HP
Torque: 278 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.7 seconds
Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 167 HP more power than Mercedes CLA, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Mercedes CLA.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.7

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLA) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.63 m
Width: 1.92 m1.78 m
Height: 1.36 m1.43 m
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower.
Chevrolet Camaro is 21 cm longer than the Mercedes CLA, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres470 litres
Mercedes CLA has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 106 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLA. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`920
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 17 80014 400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Camaro has
  • more power
Mercedes CLA has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv