Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Dodge Charger 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 328 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 32 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.0 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Charger 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 24 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 467 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 103 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |