Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 328 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro 2013 engine produces 13 HP more power than Chevrolet Camaro 2011, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Chevrolet Camaro 2011. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.6 | |
| Chevrolet Camaro 2013 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro 2011, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro 2013 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro 2013 and Chevrolet Camaro 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 289 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 290 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2013 has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro 2013 has 75 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |