Chevrolet Camaro 2018 vs Ford Mustang 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 317 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 432 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 79 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Camaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Camaro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Camaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 257 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 151 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 38 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |