Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Ford Mustang 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 4.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 453 HP | 460 HP | |
| Torque: | 617 NM | 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 7 HP less power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 48 NM more than Ford Mustang. Despite less power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 12.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 12.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 620 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 470 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Camaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.38 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 382 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`200 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |