Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs BMW 4 series 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 453 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 617 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 269 HP more power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 347 NM more than BMW 4 series. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Camaro consumes 6.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 1035 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Camaro consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 14 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 445 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`200 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |