Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Mercedes CLS 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 333 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 95 HP less power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mercedes CLS. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.0 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Equinox, Chevrolet Traverse | Used also on Mercedes E klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Camaro might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mercedes CLS engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is smaller. Chevrolet Camaro is 15 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 33 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |