Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Audi S5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 354 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
|
Audi S5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 116 HP less power than Audi S5, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Audi S5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.3 | |
|
The Audi S5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi S5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Equinox, Chevrolet Traverse | Used also on Audi S4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Camaro might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi S5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 9 cm longer than the Audi S5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi S5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 28 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi S5 has
| |