Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Audi A5 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Camaro) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 34 HP more power than Audi A5, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 16 cm longer than the Audi A5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 829 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`120 kg | 2`065 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi A5 has
| |