Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mercedes CLK has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.3 - 11.7 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 35 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 503 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`872 | ~ 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |