Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Hyundai Elantra 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Hyundai Elantra has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Hyundai Elantra can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.8 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 90 - 139 HP | |
Torque: | 305 NM | 126 - 182 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.7 - 11.1 | |
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Elantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.92 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 50 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 393 litres | |
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 530 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`872 | ~ 1`685 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |