Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Cougar has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Ford Cougar can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 130 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 176 - 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Cougar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 22 cm longer than the Ford Cougar, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 493 litres more trunk space than the Ford Cougar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`872 | ~ 1`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Ford Cougar has
| |