Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs SAAB 9-3 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 9-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 130 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 177 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | 7.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 - 12.4 | 8.8 - 11.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 28 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 295 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`823 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |