Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Chrysler Stratus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Stratus can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 - 12.4 | 9.3 - 11.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 1 cm longer than the Chrysler Stratus, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |