Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Sebring can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 141 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 188 - 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | 11.4 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 - 12.4 | 10.2 - 10.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Sebring. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.40 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |