Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs BMW Z3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.8 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 115 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 168 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | 6 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 - 12.4 | 7.8 - 10.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 87 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 165 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1.6 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |