Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Volkswagen Polo can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volkswagen Polo is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 430 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 569 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 5.6 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Camaro are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen Polo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 13.1 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 87 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 24 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | 952 litres | |
| Chevrolet Camaro has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 662 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`300 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |