Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Volvo C70 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo C70 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo C70 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 430 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 569 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 5.6 seconds | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Camaro are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo C70. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 13.1 | 5.9 - 9.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 22 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 114 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`300 | ~ 2`108 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |