Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Audi A5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Audi A5 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi A5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 (petrol) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 430 HP | 190 - 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 556 NM | 370 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 11.0 | 4.5 - 6.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 16 cm longer than the Audi A5, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi A5 has
| |