Chevrolet Camaro 2008 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Eclipse has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Eclipse can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 - 426 HP | 162 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 - 420 NM | 220 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.7 - 11.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 445 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |