Chevrolet Camaro 2008 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Eclipse has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Eclipse can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 312 - 426 HP | 162 - 263 HP | |
Torque: | 377 - 420 NM | 217 - 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.0 - 10.9 | |
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.35 m | |
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 29 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 479 litres | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |