Chevrolet Camaro 2008 vs Jaguar XK 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 - 426 HP | 385 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 - 420 NM | 515 - 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.4 - 5.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.2 - 12.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 4 cm longer than the Jaguar XK, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 330 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 10 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XK. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 2`122 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |