Chevrolet Camaro 2008 vs Ford Mustang 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 - 426 HP | 540 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 - 420 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 13.1 - 13.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro is 6 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 379 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 59 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |