Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Kia Cerato 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Kia Cerato can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | 8.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 6.9 - 7.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 5.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 33 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 433 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 69 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | ~ 1`254 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Cerato has
| |